All of the transmissions available in the market today is continuing to grow exponentially in the last 15 years, all while increasing in complexity. The effect can be that we are actually coping with a varied number of transmission types including manual, standard automatic, automated manual, dual clutch, constantly variable, split power and genuine EV.
Until extremely recently, automotive vehicle producers largely had two types of tranny to choose from: planetary automatic with torque converter or conventional manual. Today, however, the volume of options avaiable demonstrates the adjustments seen over the industry.

That is also illustrated by the countless different types of vehicles now being produced for the marketplace. And not only conventional automobiles, but also all electrical and hybrid automobiles, with each type requiring different driveline architectures.

The traditional advancement process involved designing a transmission in isolation from the engine and the rest of the powertrain and vehicle. Nevertheless, that is changing, with the restrictions and complications of the method becoming more more popular, and the constant drive among manufacturers and designers to provide optimal efficiency at reduced weight and cost.

New powertrains feature close integration of components like the prime mover, recovery systems and the gearbox, and in addition rely on highly sophisticated control systems. This is to make certain that the very best amount of efficiency and overall performance is delivered all the time. Manufacturers are under improved pressure to create powertrains that are brand new, different from and much better than the last version-a proposition that’s made more complex by the need to integrate brand elements, differentiate within the market and do it all on a shorter timescale. Engineering groups are on deadline, and the development process needs to be more efficient and fast-paced than previously.
Until now, the use of Driveline gearboxes computer-aided engineering (CAE) has been the most common way to develop drivelines. This technique involves components and subsystems designed in isolation by silos within the organization that lean toward confirmed component-level analysis tools. While they are highly advanced equipment that allow users to extract extremely dependable and accurate data, they remain presenting data that’s collected without account of the whole system.

While this may produce components that work very well individually, putting them collectively without prior thought of the entire program can create designs that don’t work, resulting in issues in the driveline that are difficult and expensive to improve.